People who make content are very busy. Most of them work more than 20 hours a week to add new information to their own websites. That doesn’t give the crowd much time to get involved. But Meta’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg believes that AI could resolve this issue.
Zuckerberg talked about his dream for the future with internet star Rowan Cheung. He said that creators will have their own “bots” that reflect their personalities and “business objectives.” Zuckerberg says that creators will use these bots to do some community outreach so that they have more time to do other, probably more important jobs.
Zuckerberg said, “I think there’s going to be a huge event where basically every creator can pull in all their information from social media and train these systems to reflect their values, their goals, and what they’re trying to do, and then people can interact with that.” “It will be kind of like an artistic object that artists make and that people can interact with in different ways.”
People who are techno-optimists often agree with Zuckerberg: AI is inherently good because it can make the effect of a single person or organization much bigger. Google has also come up with AI-powered tools for making things. But what if efficiency comes at the cost of personalization? Would creators, whose fans value authenticity, really be the ones to use generative AI?
Meta hasn’t exactly made a strong sales pitch, which doesn’t help Zuckerberg’s cause.
Meta started to release AI-powered bots earlier this year as part of its larger Meta AI push. It didn’t take long for the bots to experience the many problems that come with today’s generative AI technology, especially dreams. The Associated Press saw one bot join a chat in a Facebook group for moms in Manhattan and say it had a child in the NYC school district. In a site for trading free stuff near Boston, another bot said it would give away a camera and air conditioner that didn’t exist.
Meta’s AI is getting better, or at least that’s what the company says. From the benchmarks, it looks like Meta’s most advanced version so far is the Llama 3.1 model family, which will power a number of features across the tech giant’s platforms. But generative AI still hasn’t figured out how to stop hallucinations and other mistakes in planning and reasoning, and Meta doesn’t offer any new study in this area.
Also Read: Zuckerberg Says That Rivals With Closed-source Ai Are Trying to “make God.”
Artists probably wouldn’t trust AI bots that aren’t working right to talk to their fans. He says in the interview that Meta needs to “mitigate some of the concerns” that people have about its use of generative AI in order to gain users’ trust in the long run. In particular, this is true because some of Meta’s ways of training AI are intentionally turning creators away from its platforms.
What do you say about this story? Visit Parhlo World For more.
